Monday, April 11, 2011

The Bible and the Will of God: a Series on Christianity's Core Beliefs

From the beginning of Church history, all the way up until today, the most divisive issue for us Christians is doctrine. One person believes in infant baptism and another does not, so you fight. One person believes in having communion every week and another does not, so you fight. One person believes Jesus will return before Christians are taken up another does not, so you fight. I have been staying away from the Christian message boards because instead of being places of love and compassion, acting out Jesus' example, they are more like theological boxing rings where Christians try to knock the other person out with their best argument for their particular theology. But this is not how Jesus intended for Christians to treat each other. 1 Thessalonians 5:10-11 says "[Jesus] died for us, so that whether we are awake or asleep, we will live together with Him. Therefore encourage one another and build up one another, just as you also are doing." This is the purpose of the body of Christ, the Church, to build one another up in mutual encouragement, not to tear each other down for bad theology.

That does not mean that we are not to beware of false teachings, however. We are taught in 1 John 4:1, "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." The Bible is clear in many places that we are to beware of false teachings. Paul himself wrote many times to defend against false teachings that were being brought into the Church.

During Jesus' ministry, he warned against false teachings that came from the Pharisees called "the tradition of the elders." We find this in Mark 7 where Jesus and his disciples were eating. While they were eating, we are told that the Pharisees came up to Jesus and asked him why his disciples had not washed their hands properly before eating. This had nothing to do with germs, and everything to do with spiritual cleanliness. The Pharisees believed in the traditional teachings from older scribes who interpreted the Old Testament law in such a way that they believed it taught that one had to wash their hands a very specific way before they could eat. There were many such laws that came from the tradition of the elders, that the Pharisees believed in and was much of the reason they went around criticizing Jesus and his disciples, because they were not abiding by such traditional laws, which the Pharisees felt they needed to in order to maintain their Jewish identity against the foreign occupation of Rome.

In much the same way, Christians today hold on to interpretations that come from tradition of men rather than from the Bible, and argue for their beliefs in such a way that if you do not believe in them, you are not a good Christian. The problem is two-fold. First of all, it comes from a lack of distinction between core and marginal beliefs. Core beliefs are those beliefs that one truly must believe in order to consider oneself a part of that world view. For Christians, a core belief is a belief that is necessary for one to believe, in order for that person truly to be a Christian. Marginal beliefs are beliefs held by Christians that one can change, reformulate, or even drop, and still be considered a Christian. What often happens is that marginal beliefs are confused with core beliefs and people argue for these beliefs as if they are the most important belief one can hold. This often happens with end times beliefs. End times beliefs are really a marginal belief that many people count as a core, necessary belief, and they get enraged if you call yourself a Christian and do not believe the doctrine as they do. I will discuss this more later this week as we go through this series on core vs. marginal beliefs.

The second problem for Christians is there argumentative style. We are reminded in 1 Peter 3:15 "but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence." It seems like we all too often forget that "with gentleness and reverence" part.

As we argue for our beliefs, we need to match our tenacity with the kind of belief it is. The more core a belief, the more tenacious we can be in how we argue. If it is a marginal belief, give-in if it is obvious the other person is being stubborn. It is not worth the argument. If it is a core belief, you don't have to give-in, but remain loving, gentle, and reverent through the entire debate.

We are supposed to be Christian brothers and sisters in Christ, present for the mutual uplifting of one another. For the next three or four days I will discuss certain core beliefs that we should remain strong on, and certain marginal beliefs that we need to begin being less strong on. Remember as I go through these core and marginal beliefs that what is most important is that we follow the two greatest commandments taught to us by our Lord Jesus Christ: "to love the Lord God with all our hearts, souls, minds, and strength; and to love our neighbor as ourself." Never lose sight of the greatest commandments: the commandments to love.
Blessings,
-Brandon

2 comments:

  1. Your blog leads me to something else. The human instinct to be correct in what you believe, in many cases can be stronger than the ability to use logic. This applies to anything people are passionate about, whether religion, politics, sports, or anything one is passionate about.
    Now, when you try to bring this into a faith based argument, how can one be logical? Very little about religion is logical. There is nothing logical about miracles or dogma. The only logic (at least to me) seems to be within the obvious things, (to make simple) don't do things that effect another person in a negative way because you wouldn't want it done to you.
    Seeing that the Bible was written by man, where is distinction between dogma of man and word of God? How can one form a belief they are passionate about? It all came from man. I know the rebuttal will be that it is God's word through man. Isn't that the belief of many of the dogmatic practices, that they were given these practices/rituals to do by word of God?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Matt,
    Thanks for the comment. There is a lot to reply to. First off let me say that you are correct in your assertion that "the human instinct to be correct in what you believe, in many cases can be stronger than the ability to use logic." People tend to mold logic to fit their beliefs so that they do not have to change their beliefs. Often this is the case in such dogmatic debates as go on in the Christian community.

    Regarding your assertion that there is "very little about religion that is logical" I must disagree. I think the issue at hand is difficulty following the chain of logic, which is too long to state here. Before anything else, logic must prove there is a god. I think the existence of such an intelligent universe, along with all that is intelligent within it, is proof enough that there is a god. Once a god is proven to exist, one must then proceed with logic to discover what kind of god this is. There are many books written about this and I do not care to take up space on this issue here. But once a god is proven to exist, which is pretty easy with logic, then it is pretty easy to show how miracles can follow. But, notwithstanding all that I just said, there really isn't a whole lot in this world that is logical. Therefore, it seems that that which is most illogical (to you religion) must be most real. There are some things we just should not be dogmatic about that we too often make the central point of our entire worldview. But there are other things which I don't think can be denied. It is this distinction we will unravel throughout this series.
    Blessings,
    -Brandon

    ReplyDelete